JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – Last week, Jacksonville City Council members filed two bills, which are set to appear on Tuesday night’s agenda. They appear to do the same thing.
The response to antisemitic images that purportedly were projected onto a building in Jacksonville seemed unanimous — outright condemnation from members of the Council.
RELATED: City leaders propose multiple bills to stop messages of hate, antisemitism in Jacksonville
“We’re getting all these hate messages all of our buildings. It’s just disgusting and it’s time to stop it,” previously said Councilman Rory Diamond.
“My thoughts are like everybody else,” said Councilman Matt Carlucci. “They’re sick — well, they’re cowardly.”
“We are going to call it out for what it is, and we are not going to allow this to happen in our city any more. Period,” said Councilwoman LeAnna Cumber.
Members of City Council seem to be taking sides, even on an issue they all say they agree on.
Carlucci attended the bill announcement outside the CSX building. He supports the bill filed by Cumber a week ago.
However, Carlucci sent a letter Monday, complaining that Council rules were circumvented and that disrespect was shown to other members.
Part of it (in full at bottom of story) says: “It is a disappointment to see Council members undermine the work of others, especially concerning an issue of such importance to our city.”
Later, Carlucci says, “In the spirit of professional courtesy and statesmanship, I respectfully request the withdrawal of (the bill) 2023-0044.”
City Council President Terrance Freeman led a news conference the same day as Cumber’s news conference last week and briefly addressed the dueling bills.
”We have an issue that was impacting our city. We have a process and a plan now to address it, and it’s going to be addressed,” Freeman said. “Who gets the credit, that shouldn’t matter. That shouldn’t be the story. The story should be that we are not, as a city, we are not going to stand for hate speech to be acceptable in our city. And that’s what’s most important to me as president.”
Freeman responded to a request for comment Monday night with the following statement about Carlucci’s letter:
“It’s a shame that in a moment of unity, with the Mayor, Sheriff and 13 of my colleagues coming together in support of Bill 2023-44 that Mr. Carlucci has chosen to play politics. We should be focused on condemning antisemitism and standing up for our Jewish neighbors - not self-righteous grandstanding over who gets credit for what.”
It’s unclear what will happen Tuesday night when the bills are read and potentially voted on.
The full letter from Carlucci reads:
Council President and Esteemed Colleagues, Given the recent and disturbing demonstrations of antisemitism in Jacksonville, I am in full support of legislative action to address these hate-fueled acts. The purpose of this letter, however, is to address the circumvention of Council process and failure to extend professional courtesy to colleagues, which has resulted in two identical and competing pieces of legislation.
According to Council Rule 3.105, once a bill has been prepared or reviewed by the Office of General Counsel (OGC), each bill is filed with Legislative Services and serially numbered in the order they are received. This rule has been subverted by 2023-0044, for which a “pre-number” was requested and applied. According to a long-held practice, such numbers are held in reserve for Land Use and Zoning legislation in an understandable effort to keep companion bills sequential. And to my knowledge, requesting a pre-number for non-zoning related legislation has never occurred.
It is a disappointment to see Council members undermine the work of others, especially concerning an issue of such importance to our city. This disregard for the integrity of Council processes and absence of professional courtesy sets a precedent which corrodes our trust in the process and removes the protection granted by “first come, first serve” filing (see Rule 3.105), and introduces an unprecedented use of authority by a Council President.
In the spirit of professional courtesy and statesmanship, I respectfully request the withdrawal of 2023- 0044, and encourage its introducer, co-introducers, and co-sponsors to follow Council Rules and lend their co-sponsorship and support to 2023-0048. Furthermore, I invite my esteemed colleagues to consult with OGC about the timeline for both bills which led to this unusual and unfortunate circumstance.
Matt Carlucci