Skip to main content
Mostly Clear icon
71º

Trial of estranged couple accused in Jared Bridegan murder-for-hire plot set for Oct. 2025

Shanna Gardner, estranged husband, Mario Fernandez, accused in 2022 murder of Jared Bridegan, Gardner’s ex-husband

Booking photos of Shanna Gardner and Mario Fernandez (Provided by Jacksonville Sheriff's Office)

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.Shanna Gardner and Mario Fernandez, her estranged husband, were back in court Wednesday for a pre-trial hearing in the murder-for-hire case against them.

In the hearing, the judge set a trial date for 2025. Jury selection was scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025, at 9 a.m.

Recommended Videos



Gardner and Fernandez are accused of plotting to kill Gardner’s ex-husband, Jared Bridegan, in 2022.

Gardner and Fernandez are under indictment for first-degree murder in Bridegan’s killing, and both face the possibility of the death penalty.

A former tenant of Fernandez, Henry Tenon, admitted to pulling the trigger in the ambush shooting in Jacksonville Beach in 2022.

Henry Tenon, left, and Mario Fernandez, right, are accused in a murder-for-hire plot to kill Jared Bridegan.

RELATED: Shanna Gardner’s estranged husband’s phone pinged at rental property for man who shot Jared Bridegan, docs show

Police say the father of four was gunned down while trying to move a tire that had been placed in the road as part of the ambush.

At their last court appearance last month, Judge London Kite denied requests from Gardner’s attorneys to have her released on bond and to have the charges dismissed.

Kite said she ruled “without prejudice” and told Gardner’s defense they could bring up the issues in their motion again if new information came to light.

Gardner’s attorneys have been arguing prosecutorial misconduct, saying the state “knowingly presented false evidence that was material to the court’s denial of bond” and that Gardner’s due process rights have been violated.

READ: Motion from Gardner’s attorneys to dismiss case

During the last hearing, Judge Kite OK’d a motion from the defense to compel the prosecution to hand over a list of records/people it subpoenaed who are out of state.

She did not rule on a motion the defense filed requesting a transcript of a detective’s grand jury testimony.